RE:

[xoder]

Sex is not a subset of poking. They are disjoint sets, satisfying different drives. That is all, have a nice day.
---FORWARDED---

Comments

It is a subset of poking

[orangecream.livejournal.com]

You are wrong, and Kitri, Charlene and I are right.

I would like to bring your attention to this thread, in which I am right and you are not

[xoder.livejournal.com]

http://www.livejournal.com/users/xoder/312820.html?thread=412660#t412660

[unlovablehands.livejournal.com]

this just reminded me: you still owe me money for all those bets you lost. bucko.

[kitty-trie.livejournal.com]

sex is a subset of poking. its a type of poking, and its higher priority of pokingness

(The only valid use of ad hominim)

[xoder.livejournal.com]

Seeing as how none of the people who disagree with me have penises, I would have to say that you have no basis for the statements you are making.

[zsparke.livejournal.com]

I totally agree.

[xoder.livejournal.com]

Thank gods a girl agrees with me. All these women, and their not-having-penises, fully misunderstandanding the relationship between poking and sex!