(no subject)

[xoder]

http://www.bcentral.com/articles/komando/104.asp?cobrand=msn&LID=3800

How unsurprising

Comments

[b55b55.livejournal.com]

it was reasonably intersting but i stopped reading when i realized the woman is comparing computers of compleately different specifications

[ladyravn.livejournal.com]

Well Mac computers are supposedly "much faster," even though they have a lower processor speed.

Re:

[xoder.livejournal.com]

Its much like the RISC vs. CISC debate. The answer is, they're both faster, just ask the right questions.

My entry was just a referral to the fact that such Mac-bashing was on a M$ site.

[alexatrit.livejournal.com]

I may be wrong, but don't most Mac machines use a RISC-based Motorola chip? That would be, uh... explanatory.

[alexatrit.livejournal.com]

I do wonder how those processors would fare under datacenter conditions. We know the the Alpha processors handle quite well under high use - even at a lower clockspeed. Example: Grace has three 533MHz Alpha-series processors - and look what it handles without issue.

I've never seen a Mac/Motorola combination used in any production server environment. Have you?