rather not be used for means of death or destruction.
what a horribly narrow viewpoint! what about being used to generate bridges for third world countries or earthquake relief structures or transportation alternatives in disaster areas or any of the thousands of relief type projects that engineers head in the military.
i find that only people who dont know a thing about the military categorize it singularly with death and destruction. whatever- if its not for you, its not for you, but dont take an ignorant or uninformed point of view.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
(no subject)
Date: 2003-01-11 04:58 pm (UTC)what a horribly narrow viewpoint! what about being used to generate bridges for third world countries or earthquake relief structures or transportation alternatives in disaster areas or any of the thousands of relief type projects that engineers head in the military.
i find that only people who dont know a thing about the military categorize it singularly with death and destruction. whatever- if its not for you, its not for you, but dont take an ignorant or uninformed point of view.