On readings

Jun. 2nd, 2008 07:50 am
xoder: (Default)
[personal profile] xoder
Found in 125 Street Station. No, I've not gone to the site.

I started reading 'The Portable Atheist', and I have to admit I feel very vulnerable when I do so on the train. I know it's not rational, but I recognise that atheists make up one of America's least favorite minorities. Don't believe me? There have been polls that showed that not only do a majority of Americans believe in angels, but an overwhelming majority believe that atheists are unfit to be president, or to teach.

Rational or not, I'm most worried that a casual aquaintance will think less of me for not needing or wanting a Supreme Being in my life. Frankly, I do not understand what triggers the Theistic Question in the first place. But back to my paranoia for a moment - see how ingrained the concept of 'atheism = moral failing' is? And this from a lifelong atheist.

Oh, and I want to talk about theodicy for a moment. Pope Guilty posted about it recently, and it turned out to be a word I'd been looking for. Out of space!
Photo-0007.jpg

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 02:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] electricpaladin.livejournal.com
That's true, and I can see how that annoying narrowing of their perspective would have gone over my head.

In general, I think their attitude of 'if it's not based on reason it isn't valid' is extremely limiting. Reason is great, but it's highly overrated. I believe that what makes us exceptional creatures is that we are willing to go beyond reason. Animals have excellent reasoning skills. Bacteria are great at multiplication. Sea Slugs have done a difficult cost-benefit analysis and come to surprising conclusions. Only humans (and higher animals, like the charismatic megafauna that we're all so fond of) show signs of emotion.
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 08:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios